Method Home: Design for Germaphobes
When you know the germs are out to get you, inspired product and packaging design can make feverish hand-washing a joy.
I’ll admit it: I’m a germaphobe.
I squirm when in the presence of germs and even talking about bacteria can cause a spat of feverish hand washing. So, you can imagine my love/hate relationship with soap. I have a hard enough time touching faucets or door handles in public restrooms, so slimy soap dishes and stained, gooey pump dispensers are so…<insert heebie jeebie shiver here>… disgusting.
Enter Method Home to save me from this plight.
I was in love the first moment I saw the bowling-pin shaped soap bottle Method design with the help of Karim Rashid. The bold shape and color made the product stand out in a category plagued by sameness, but it was more fun and easier to use with its bottom dispensing system. Later I discovered their refillable foaming hand wash dispensers with their clear, smooth, subtly curved conical shape. I was inspired and since then they’ve been my constant companions, sitting next to my sinks and home and at work.
I love how Method products push boundaries with provocative designs. Their containers always seemed more like sex toys than consumer goods to me. No other consumer product in recent memory became a common topic of conversations around water coolers and in the kitchen at parties when they first arrived on the scene a number of years ago.
Far more than just lollipop plastic soap dispensers, the whole Method line of products excites me. Their philosophy of creating products and packaging that don’t harm the environment make them all the more appealing to me. And their use of mild, natural scents that don’t make you gag is another example of the thought and care put into the design of their products. Their approach to balancing form and function set them apart—almost like objects d’art with their carefully chosen colors, sexy shapes and smart, recyclable materials. Even the minimal use of copy contributes to the simplicity inherent in each of their designs. Like beautiful glass bottles that I can’t bring to myself to throw away and end up in my kitchen, I find myself refilling my Method dispensers with various candy-colored liquid soap. Why recycle bottles when you never throw them out? Brilliant.
Method’s industrial design team, led by Creative Director Josh Handy, has repeatedly incorporated creative thinking into their product designs and each iteration or extension seems as innovative and intelligent as the last. Method is one of those companies that is making design important again—without making it intrusive or pretentious. By employing good design and focussing on products that not only work, but stand out from the crowd, they’ve managed to infiltrate millions of homes—all without the aid of major advertising campaigns mind you. Why should they bother really? When you’re standing in the soap aisle at the market, their beautifully designed products stand out in sharp contrast to their numerous competitors. They’ve managed to make products that make their own demand and deserve the dominant position they’ve earned in the consumer home goods market.
Method Home’s products won’t cure me of my germaphobia, but in my home, the roles of form and function meld together in seamless beauty as I gleefully squirt the next palm-full of foamy soap and wash those evil germs and bacteria away. Ew.
Entries (RSS)







June 28th, 2008 at 9:01 pm
I will be doing the same, but I will line up for it. Although, I think I’ll try to go through a Rogers store rather than the Apple store - it’s going to be a gong show on the 11th.
June 30th, 2008 at 10:24 am
blind apple loyalty + canadians not know anything better = rogers ass raping us on the iphone and prolonging our 3rd world mobile standing
what part of the roger plan seems “pretty decent” to you?
http://ruinediphone.com/
July 2nd, 2008 at 9:22 am
Hey Kevin. I was making a comment based on what I am currently paying TELUS for and for me, and I’m sure others, it will be a switch with little difference in monthly costs, hence my, “pretty decent” comment. It’s also a hell of a lot better than the surprises some people where getting with monthly bills over $1,000 with their hacked iPhones. Now, do I think Canadians are getting screwed by the mobile companies, both out of features, the best phones and with high costs relative to other countries? Absolutely. Do I object to getting nickeled and dimed to death for every little feature or use (even on my home TELUS line). You bet. Am I willing to give any of it up in protest? No.
July 11th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
I would not mind paying $60 per month, as long as there are no additional hidden costs like the system access fee, no roaming charges, unlimited data (although I will most likely never to exceed 6gbs, I still want to use it without constantly wondering if I have exceeded the limit), and a much shorter contract, if at all. For now, I will just live with my Sony Ericsson and my iPod Touch.